Mission Statement
The K.M.C. Cycling Club is a diverse group of people from across the Kaiserslautern Military Community (KMC) brought together by a common interest in cycling and cycling advocacy. Whether through racing, group rides, community involvement or social events centered on cycling, K.M.C. Cycling's primary purpose is to further the sport of cycling in the KMC, and provide a valuable cycling outlet to its members. We are a not-for-profit organization that values diversity, friendship and, above all, a good ride.
The K.M.C. Cycling Club is a diverse group of people from across the Kaiserslautern Military Community (KMC) brought together by a common interest in cycling and cycling advocacy. Whether through racing, group rides, community involvement or social events centered on cycling, K.M.C. Cycling's primary purpose is to further the sport of cycling in the KMC, and provide a valuable cycling outlet to its members. We are a not-for-profit organization that values diversity, friendship and, above all, a good ride.
Latest topics
Like Us
Percieved Exertion vs. Heart Rate
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Percieved Exertion vs. Heart Rate
I'm starting a training plan next week. This plan uses zone training in 5 zones (actually it's eight zones with the subzones of zone 5).
These zones are based on percentages of Lactic Threshold Heart Rate, but also give guidelines for a scale of Rate of Percieved Exertion. I understand the concept of the Lactic Threshhold and the Lactic Threshold Heart Rate and how a heart rate monitor cna be used to help control which zone you are in. I also can 'get' the idea of using RPE to figure out which zone you are in and adjust your effort accordingly.
I'm curious if the more serious racers out there have some advise/experience with these two techniques of gauging your zone.
Here's what I think based on the research I've done so far on the pros and cons of each:
RPE-Rate of PErcieved Exersion
PROS:
-Don't need to buy anything or strap any more doo-dads to my bike (this is a BIG plus for me)
-Less distractions allow me to focus more on riding and enjoy what I'm doing
-I'm probably smart enough to handle this one
CONS:
-Not as precise (not sure I'd be able to distinguish between the sub zones of zone 5 at ALL)
-Not as reliable
Heart Rate Monitor
PROS:
-Precise and accurate
-Reliable
CONS:
-More crap on my bike
-more distractions
-Something new to have to learn and I'm pretty sure I'm not smart enough to figure out all the various bells and whistles
-Somehting else I need to buy
Those are my thoughts so far... what are y'all's thoughts?
These zones are based on percentages of Lactic Threshold Heart Rate, but also give guidelines for a scale of Rate of Percieved Exertion. I understand the concept of the Lactic Threshhold and the Lactic Threshold Heart Rate and how a heart rate monitor cna be used to help control which zone you are in. I also can 'get' the idea of using RPE to figure out which zone you are in and adjust your effort accordingly.
I'm curious if the more serious racers out there have some advise/experience with these two techniques of gauging your zone.
Here's what I think based on the research I've done so far on the pros and cons of each:
RPE-Rate of PErcieved Exersion
PROS:
-Don't need to buy anything or strap any more doo-dads to my bike (this is a BIG plus for me)
-Less distractions allow me to focus more on riding and enjoy what I'm doing
-I'm probably smart enough to handle this one
CONS:
-Not as precise (not sure I'd be able to distinguish between the sub zones of zone 5 at ALL)
-Not as reliable
Heart Rate Monitor
PROS:
-Precise and accurate
-Reliable
CONS:
-More crap on my bike
-more distractions
-Something new to have to learn and I'm pretty sure I'm not smart enough to figure out all the various bells and whistles
-Somehting else I need to buy
Those are my thoughts so far... what are y'all's thoughts?
Jonesy- Officer
- Posts : 1007
Join date : 2010-11-18
Re: Percieved Exertion vs. Heart Rate
If you have ever ridden with a HRM, you will quickly see that how you feel has very little to do with your heart rate. You can feel like hammered poop and you heart rate will still be low. On the other hand you can feel great and when you look at your pulse it is 170 (very common with races). I don't think you can judge a zone based on how your "feel". I know we did it for years, but the first real tool cycling got to put science to racing was HRM. Now we have power meters which brings even more data in. The "how I feel" training method is a couple generations old.
spookyload- Posts : 1167
Join date : 2010-11-21
Age : 55
Location : Vogelweh, Germany
Re: Percieved Exertion vs. Heart Rate
Matt, thanks for the insight! Ill chat you up for advise on monitors at the ride tomorrow.
Jonesy- Officer
- Posts : 1007
Join date : 2010-11-18
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Mon Oct 03, 2016 5:33 pm by Zenkem
» Forest Night Ride. "No Drop"
Fri Sep 23, 2016 3:54 pm by Zenkem
» Winterberg bike park trip!
Tue Sep 13, 2016 8:02 am by Justachillin2
» Lunch in France... (Sat 17Sep2016)
Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:27 pm by Pritch
» Weekly Thursday NO DROP MTB group ride Gelterswoog 2016 season!
Thu Sep 08, 2016 4:26 pm by Pritch